Monday, January 23, 2012

Obama --- WHY HAS NO ONE BROUGHT THIS UP?

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

WHY HAS NO ONE BROUGHT THIS UP?! Why hasn't this been discussed in the major media?????
Posted By: watcher51445
Date: Monday, 23-Jan-2012 12:34:55

From: Anna
Date: January 23, 2012 10:12:45 PM PST
“Very Interesting Bit Of Detective Work”
1. Back in 1961 people of color were called 'Negroes.' So how can the Obama 'birth certificate' state he is 'African-American' when the term wasn't even used at that time?
2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961. It also lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in " Kenya , East Africa ". This wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the " British East Africa Protectorate".
3. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital ". This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home", respectively. The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?
Resources:
http://www.kapiolani.org/women-and-children/about-us/default.aspx
Post-colonial history (from Wikipedia)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Kenya
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya
Why hasn't this been discussed in the major media?????
Tim McEwing
Attorney at Law

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

BECAUSE THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA IS JUST AS CORRUPT, IF NOT MORE SO, THAN THE VERY ONES WHOSE ACTIONS THEY HAVE COVERED UP FOR ONLY GOD KNOWS HOW LONG! BUT GOD IS NOT MOCKED, AND THEIR CORRUPT DEEDS ARE NOW EXPOSED FOR ALL TO SEE! THIS IS THEIR DAY OF RECKONING, AND HASHEM/ELOHIM HAS SPOKEN! BE SURE TO KNOW YOUR SIN HAS FOUND YOU OUT! YOU ARE IN DIVINE DISHONOR OF HIS WORD AND HIS WILL! THE TORAH REMINDS US THAT IT IS A FEARFUL THING TO FALL INTO THE HANDS OF THE LIVING GOD! TRUTH WILL ALWAYS PREVAIL! LOOK AT WHAT HAPPENED TO THE PHARAOH OF EGYPT AND TO ALL WHO CONSPIRED WITH HIM AGAINST OUR SOVEREIGN GOD!

DCDubbs said...

When the issue of Obama's Birth Certificate came up last spring, I called to get on a talk show when the Birth Certificate topic was hot.

Was on radio talk show cue line, call screener asked what my take was on this, told him about the 1866 civil rights authors describing the requirement for both parents having allegiance to the USA, not one. Obama's father born in Africa, not natural born.

The call screener said, "You solved the puzzle, congratulations!"
"OK, how long before I get on the show with the host?"
Screener, "Oh, you're not getting on, have a nice day".

He's being protected, the fraud is obvious.

One parent with an allegiance to a foreign country/jurisdiction is suspect for raising their child loyal for the USA. Like Barack, see what his agenda is?

Born in the USA has nothing to do with it, not going to penalize a armed services couple who has a baby while serving on a foreign military base, ex, John McCain in born in Panama during his parents armed service.

Citations from 39th Congress, Congressional Globe, circ 1865-66 also, Minor v Happersett, Supreme Court, (same era),... 2 parents with no foreign allegiance is the special requirement for natural born status..

Anonymous said...

To Tim McEwing

What you say is pure conjecture until the document that you claim is fraudulent is also produced for perusal to counter argument. The term African-American was freely used in the medical field in 1961 as a substitute for the inaccurate term "COLORED" which was in use during the 1950's and before, when filling out medical documents for African Americans. The term is a designation of heritage, of a citizen in question, born on American soil. i.e. Latin-American, Italian-American, Chinese-American, and so on. The term is not inaccurate if it pre-dates your knowledge of it being used by others to designate heritage and birthright. His father was African and Obama is an American son of that same African. Also, your claims of what is on the actual COLB are only fiction until evidence is produced to back your claim.

Anonymous said...

DCDUBBS JAN 23 12:30:

TELL US WHO THE RADIO TALK SHOW WAS SO THAT WE KNOW WHOM IS PROTECTING HIM. ALL OF THEM ABSOLUTELY! BUT WHY NOT OUT THIS ONE? IT IS TIME TO TAKE IT TO THE MEDIA WHO HAS PROTECTED EVERY SINISTER THING THAT IS HAPPENING IN THIS COUNTRY. WHITHOUT THEIR HELP THEY WOULD NOT HAVE GOTTEN AWAY WITH ALL OF THE LIES; DECEIT; KILLINGS; POISONINGS; AND CHEMTRAILING AND SO ON AND SO FORTH. IF A TALK SHOW HOST OR A NEWS STATION IS NOT TALKING ABOUT CHEMTRAILS AND GLOBAL GOVERNMENT AND THE FACT THAT WE ARE ALREADY RULED BY THE UNITED NATIONS AND THAT WE ARE UNDER BRITISH RULE. SO GIVE UP THE NAME!!!!

Anonymous said...

I've heard of point #1, but never point #2 nor #3. EXCELLENT!!!

Anonymous said...

AMEN!! IS THERE ANYONE BRAVE ENOUGH TO TACKLE THIS?? WHY CAN'T SOMEONE DISCUSS THIS IN CONGRESS! OUR COUNTRY IS BEEN RUINED BY THE TORAH! THIS IS AMERICA AND WE BELIEVE IN GOD!!