Monday, January 22, 2018

NOL's and Court System Basics


By Anna Von Reitz


I recently got a "complaint" letter from a reader who apparently got in trouble himself or had friends who were "thrown in jail" as a result of using a Notice of Liability---- and he wanted to let me know that a process I had recommended wasn't working, etc.

There are two kinds of courts typically at work in America.  Both are foreign to us. American courts have to be staffed and run by us, so until more people take up their responsibility to self-govern, they are relatively rare.

There is the Territorial Court System, meaning British Territorial United States Court System that shouldn't even be addressing us, which uses British "Equity" Law and there is the MUNICIPAL COURT SYSTEM that uses COMMERCIAL LAW, which is used by the equally foreign MUNICIPAL UNITED STATES. 

A Notice of Liability is a commercial document to be used in commercial processes and commercial courts recognize it the same way they would recognize a Bill of Lading or an Invoice.  It's a normal part of doing business in the commercial realm and is in fact part of your DUTY to fully disclose and properly inform. The reason you do Notices of Liability is not to threaten anyone. It is to fully inform them of their liability in a matter that is either harming you or likely to harm you.

No doubt you have all encountered the concept of "plausible deniability" wherein terrible acts are committed, but the person responsible says, "I didn't know!" ---?  So a Notice of Liability lets such people know and thereby holds them accountable in advance for their actions.  That is the value of a Notice of Liability when going into a commercial court action. 

In a commercial court setting, properly composed and entered Notices of Liability can't be interpreted as a "threat" and the examples that were posted on www.InPowerMovement.com --- at least at the time I wrote my article, were all properly executed and could not possibly get anyone in trouble.

You will note that the entire discussion about Notices of Liability came up in the context of addressing Smart Meters being installed by Public Utility companies, which really should be a big clue to everyone that we are talking about commercial operations and commercial courts and commercial processes that are run through the MUNICIPAL COURTS.

Notices of Liability in the Territorial Court System are a completely different matter and NOT ADVISED. 

British Equity Law is a supremely evil thing, because it empowers the judge to act--- literally---- as the King.  This form of law came about as a result of polluting English Common Law with Admiralty Law back in the 1750's. It gives the judges vast "powers of discretion" to do whatever they want with little or no reference to the written law or facts.  They are able under "Equity Law" to dispose of you and your assets as possessions of the King, with them playing King. 

This is convenient for the actual King, because these sycophants rule in "his" favor and the favor of the elites and the "government" over 97% of the time and if by chance they do something that is unpopular enough to cause riots, the King can wash his dainty hands and appear as the Peacemaker, when in fact this system was created as an instrument of brutal despotism and arbitrary abuse of power.

That's what you are dealing with in the Territorial State of State Courts, and the best advice is to stay out of them entirely.  If you have your BC and your Certificate of Assumed Name and Act of State claiming your birthright political status on the public record  and you bring that information forward, the Territorial Courts aren't supposed to address you at all. 

The Territorial Courts are operating as "pirate vessels" dry-docked on our "shores" and they are "press-ganging" American assets for British pockets, so it is paramount for you to realize that if they can find a means of charging you they will--- but they can only do so if you are acting in some capacity within their jurisdiction. 

They pull you into their jurisdiction by "presuming" (mostly from the fact that you actually showed up in their court) that you are a (Territorial) United States Citizen and acting in that capacity.  If so, they can throw the book at you, and they do so with gusto.  That's why it is so important to properly identify yourself as a non-citizen non-combatant civilian owed the Law of Peace and that you were not acting in the capacity of a Territorial Citizen at the time whatever you are charged with took place and aren't acting in that capacity in coming to the court.

These courts have a strictly defined 12 mile radius of operations, so if you stay outside that area they are technically not able to arrest you and I generally advise people to conduct all business that may be necessary with these courts via the mail.  They have no right to address you, but you do have a duty to properly identify yourself and your activities as not being subject to their court.

That these foreign courts have been allowed to run rampant on American soil is a terrible travesty that you can hold the politicians responsible for--- being careful not to let them misidentify you as a "citizen" either.  I went so far as to send a Registered Letter to the entire Alaska Congressional Delegation making it clear that I am not acting in the capacity of a municipal or territorial citizen and they are not authorized to presume upon or represent me, but are instead obligated to do my bidding. 

And then of course I told them exactly what I required. None of them ever replied and I did not expect them to.  They aren't supposed to address us.  That's why they fall silent.  When you properly identify yourself they know you are not "one of them" and they shuffle off because you are not one of their Territorial or Municipal constituents.  You are, however, one of their employers and it is when you act in that capacity that they are obliged to obey.

Once you start paying attention and noticing these things the logic of it all clicks into place.  Until then, be aware that commercial documents belong only in commercial court actions and be aware that the British Equity judges and prosecutors are from the Territorial United States (think Puerto Rico and Guam) and shouldn't even be addressing you at all.

 ----------------------------
See this article and over 800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

They all asked for a process. And then when you tell them that there is no process they get mad and act like you are keeping a secret. But if you tell them a process works the first time or that it works until it doesn't they still act like you lied.
None of them have done the homework they don't have a Black's Law Dictionary they haven't been to court they don't know what words mean they know nothing about personal jurisdiction of subject matter jurisdiction and when they get in trouble they want to run to a piece of paper and think that it will save them.
The piece of paper get you attention. Once you get their attention then comes the test. There is no process to help you pass the test. And the last fact is when they put a contract in front of you you easily sign it. So all of these folks that went to jail ask them what their signature look like on the contract they were given that they would totally unaware they were accepting an offer to sit in jail. There's no process for the way the Mind thinks